National Geographic likes bugs a little bit too much, don't they?
I mean, we certainly understand National Geographic does some worthwhile work; tigers certainly don’t film themselves eating gazelles, now do they? It certainly goes without saying that the lion’s share of National Geographic's work is very commendable, as it generally involves worthwhile footage of deservedly noteworthy mammals, amphibians and reptiles from across the globe. Is their anything more delightful and relaxing than watching a rare poisonous frog gleefully soar through the air in slow motion? Is their any greater piece of viewing material in existence than a mountainside bearded goat death match? Is their any physical action a human can engage in more substantially worthwhile than sitting on a couch all afternoon watching ducks swim? We think not.However, with that being said, our opinion of the nature loving organization goes from admiration to infuriation when their passive and soft handed treatment of insects comes into play. How can anyone film something as deplorable as what has been captured in this video segment and not succumb to the overwhelming urge to kill at will?
